{"id":1979,"date":"2013-08-31T18:38:01","date_gmt":"2013-08-31T17:38:01","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/tazmpictures.com\/site\/?p=1979"},"modified":"2025-10-16T17:23:30","modified_gmt":"2025-10-16T16:23:30","slug":"six-16-brownie-special-with-found-film","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/tazmpictures.com\/site\/?p=1979","title":{"rendered":"Six-16 Brownie Special with Found Film?"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<p>I&#8217;ve mentioned it before, and I still can&#8217;t tell you why: &nbsp;I like taking old rolls of film I come across, and getting them developed to see what secrets they hold. &nbsp;It costs much more than modern film, and probably half the time there are no pictures to be salvaged. &nbsp;People think it&#8217;s weird &#8211; but when I successfully get an image, it&#8217;s fun to wonder who the people are in the photo (it seems like old photos always have people as their subject) &#8211; and why the photographer thought a particular image was worth capturing on film. &nbsp;And then completely forgetting about it. &nbsp;Maybe they got a new camera and the old one was set aside for 60 years &#8211; who knows?<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Before you get your hopes up, this is one of those times I didn&#8217;t get an image.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Awhile back I picked up an old Six-16 Brownie Special which was said to contain &nbsp;a partly exposed roll of film. &nbsp;The thing about a Six-16 is that it uses 616 film (strange coincidence, I know!). &nbsp;But 616 film is a variation of 116 film &#8211; it just has a thinner spool. &nbsp;Neither 616 nor 116 film have been made in years, and are extremely hard to get your hands on. &nbsp;Other film types can be cut from 120 film, but 616\/116 are wider than standard 120 film, removing this option. &nbsp;This is what it looks like, in comparison to the slightly shorter 120 roll:<\/p>\n\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-image aligncenter\"><a href=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/tazmpictures.com\/site\/wp-content\/uploads\/2013\/08\/DSC06340.jpg?ssl=1\"><img data-recalc-dims=\"1\" loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" width=\"600\" height=\"398\" src=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/tazmpictures.com\/site\/wp-content\/uploads\/2013\/08\/DSC06340.jpg?resize=600%2C398&#038;ssl=1\" alt=\"DSC06340\" class=\"wp-image-1980\" srcset=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/tazmpictures.com\/site\/wp-content\/uploads\/2013\/08\/DSC06340.jpg?resize=600%2C398&amp;ssl=1 600w, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/tazmpictures.com\/site\/wp-content\/uploads\/2013\/08\/DSC06340.jpg?resize=300%2C199&amp;ssl=1 300w, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/tazmpictures.com\/site\/wp-content\/uploads\/2013\/08\/DSC06340.jpg?w=2000&amp;ssl=1 2000w, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/tazmpictures.com\/site\/wp-content\/uploads\/2013\/08\/DSC06340.jpg?w=3000&amp;ssl=1 3000w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 600px) 100vw, 600px\" \/><\/a><\/figure>\n\n\n\n<p><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>So I had high hopes when I received the camera, with its roll of film that had been wound to exposure number 3. &nbsp;I was hopeful that numbers 1 and maybe even 2 would turn out. &nbsp;I quickly snapped a few photos to use up the roll and sent it off.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>While we wait for the film to be developed and return, a bit more background: the camera itself was manufactured between 1938 and 1942. &nbsp;It took negatives that were 2.5 inches by 4.25 inches &#8211; compare that to 12o film which takes 6 x 9 cm exposures (2.4 by 3.6 inches) and 35mm film, which takes 24 x 36 mm exposures (less than one inch by 1.4 inches). &nbsp;The Brownie Six-16 had a trapezoidal shape to accommodate the wider-than-normal exposure, as seen in the photos below:<\/p>\n\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-image is-resized\"><a href=\"http:\/\/www.flickr.com\/photos\/tazmpictures\/8904590829\/\"><img data-recalc-dims=\"1\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/tazmpictures.com\/site\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/10\/8904590829_e4141c63bc.jpg?ssl=1\" alt=\"Eastman Kodak Six-16 Brownie Special\" style=\"width:670px;height:auto\"\/><\/a><\/figure>\n\n\n\n<p><\/p>\n\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-image is-resized\"><a href=\"http:\/\/www.flickr.com\/photos\/tazmpictures\/8904593765\/\"><img data-recalc-dims=\"1\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/tazmpictures.com\/site\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/10\/8904593765_017d82f83a.jpg?ssl=1\" alt=\"Eastman Kodak Six-16 Brownie Special\" style=\"width:670px;height:auto\"\/><\/a><\/figure>\n\n\n\n<p><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>You could turn the camera either way &#8211; to take landscape-like photos, or very tall photos. &nbsp;The switch under the lens would change the focus to over\/under 15 feet, and there was also a switch to leave the shutter open for an extended period. &nbsp;I have a couple of these, and I&#8217;ve noticed that the mechanism to prevent the shutter release from accidentally being pushed, 80 years after the camera was manufactured, sometimes makes it difficult to release the shutter on purpose. &nbsp;It&#8217;s a heavy camera, made of metal, and on many of them (like this one) the leather strap on top is damaged or missing.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>So back to the photos. &nbsp;It turns out that the years were not kind to the photos that had been taken by the previous owner. &nbsp;It could also be that no photos were taken, and someone advanced the film with the camera open, curious to see how it worked. &nbsp;But I wish I had paid more attention when I snapped the additional photos, because those actually turned out. &nbsp;Though the film was manufactured all the way through the 1980s, the Kodacolor-X film used in this camera was manufactured between 1963 and 1974. &nbsp;That means that this film was at least 40 years old. &nbsp;The C-22 process was discontinued years ago, and the film was processed as black and white film. &nbsp;I think it&#8217;s remarkable for an 80-year-old camera using 40-year-0ld film:<\/p>\n\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-image is-resized\"><a href=\"http:\/\/www.flickr.com\/photos\/tazmpictures\/9623648807\/\"><img data-recalc-dims=\"1\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/tazmpictures.com\/site\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/10\/9623648807_06d16946ba.jpg?ssl=1\" alt=\"616 Film Test\" style=\"width:670px;height:auto\"\/><\/a><\/figure>\n\n\n\n<p><\/p>\n\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-image is-resized\"><a href=\"http:\/\/www.flickr.com\/photos\/tazmpictures\/9623634305\/\"><img data-recalc-dims=\"1\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/tazmpictures.com\/site\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/10\/9623634305_b88fb692e8.jpg?ssl=1\" alt=\"616 Film Test\" style=\"width:670px;height:auto\"\/><\/a><\/figure>\n\n\n\n<p><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>So what&#8217;s next? Well, since <a href=\"http:\/\/bluemooncamera.com\/\" target=\"_blank\">Blue Moon Camera<\/a> was kind enough to send back the spool with the backing paper intact, I may try rigging the spool up with some 120 film, and seeing what I can accomplish with the camera and some newer film.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>I&#8217;ve mentioned it before, and I still can&#8217;t tell you why: &nbsp;I like taking old rolls of film I come across, and getting them developed to see what secrets they hold. &nbsp;It costs much more than modern film, and probably half the time there are no pictures to be salvaged. &nbsp;People think it&#8217;s weird &#8211; [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[856,803],"tags":[993,992,990,96,842,991,805],"class_list":["post-1979","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-found-film-vintage-cameras","category-vintage-cameras","tag-116-film","tag-992","tag-brownie","tag-camera","tag-found-film","tag-six-16","tag-vintage"],"acf":[],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/tazmpictures.com\/site\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1979","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/tazmpictures.com\/site\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/tazmpictures.com\/site\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/tazmpictures.com\/site\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/tazmpictures.com\/site\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=1979"}],"version-history":[{"count":3,"href":"https:\/\/tazmpictures.com\/site\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1979\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":7685,"href":"https:\/\/tazmpictures.com\/site\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1979\/revisions\/7685"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/tazmpictures.com\/site\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=1979"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/tazmpictures.com\/site\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=1979"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/tazmpictures.com\/site\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=1979"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}