Redscale Photography – First Attempts

Being new to film photography, I had never heard of “redscale photography” until I spotted this on on Flickr and had to know how he had gotten this effect:

20130504_018

Wanting to try it out on my own, I did a bit of research and discovered that the “redscale film” being offered by some vendors is really nothing other than ordinary film, run through the camera backward – i.e. so the light goes through the film before it hits the emulsion.  So I went down to the garage (the darkest room at my house but from the film results maybe not quite dark enough) and wound a roll of 35mm film backward into a discarded roll. (Here’s how I made my own redscale film)  Then I loaded it into an old Ricoh Kr-5 and started shooting. When I got my film back, a number of the photos in the middle and beginning of the roll were ruined (overexposed), but I think that was due to errors in the process of reversing the film.

What I learned from the photos that did turn out is that a bit of underexposure (or smaller aperture) increases the redscale effect. Take these, for instance:

Katutura Yard 2 Katutura Yard

The one on the left is almost like it was taken using normal film. I think the aperture was something like f/5.6.

This is another example:

Panel Beater 2 Panel Beater 1 Panel Beater 3

In this case, you can underexpose too much, but there is something to be said for the darkest photo. Kind of like this one:

Katutura Sidewalk

Here are the rest of the “better” photos on this roll:

Raildroad Bridge

Namib Mills

Oh yeah – when you take a photo backward through the film, everything gets flipped in reverse!

This entry was posted in Namibia, Photography, general and tagged , . Bookmark the permalink.

Got something you'd like to add? Do it here! You'll be asked to provide your email address one time only. This is to weed out junk and spam. Thanks!

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.